![]() ![]() Once launched, you will instantly feel that it is very different from Firefox, the tabs look a bit rectangular, there is no ‘pocket’ button available beside ‘Bookmarks’, and so on. Now, open the extracted folder and double-click on the ‘Waterfox’ file to launch the application. Once downloaded, extract the tar.bz file by right-clicking on it, and selecting ‘Extract’. Download The Tarball From Official Website For example on my laptop with an i7-4720HQ, Waterfox 40.1.0 runs about 20 faster in the JetStream (successor to SunSpider) benchmark compared to Firefox. Visit the official website and download the tarball available for Linux. If you want to learn how the two compare, read our Microsoft Edge vs Chrome comparison. Unfortunately, this application is not available in any Linux repository, as a Flatpak application, or even as a snap package, you will have to run it using a tarball. Although not as extensive as Chromes add-on library, Firefox. Extensive UI customizations are also available.Available on all the major desktop OS – Windows, Linux, and macOS.However if you’re expecting the fact Waterfox is 64-bit to cure existing issues with Firefox primarily concerning performance and memory-munching, I seriously doubt anyone who uses it will notice any significant difference. It offers a separate edition to support legacy web extensions. Add-ons that work in regular Firefox seem to work in Waterfox with no issues, so that’s good.The good news is that you can remove Pocket from Firefox with just a few clicks. Support for NPAPI plugins & Bootstrap extensions. Waterfox disables Pocket by default, while Firefox (especially Firefox Quantum) has Pocket deeply integrated within the browser’s working processes.Some of its features that are worth mentioning are : Mozilla Firefox is ranked 9th while Waterfox is ranked 20th. ![]() ![]() In this tutorial, we will take a look at the features of this browser and try to install this on our Linux distribution. While its still pretty responsive, not only do most forms send a lot of information. Waterfox on the other hand seems to be the right choice for you if you are looking for a balance between privacy and usability. Another Firefox fork that aims to push its privacy and security limits. On Android, you have a lot of alternatives such as Mull, Fenix, etc., but on the Desktop side of things there don’t seem to be a lot of alternatives except perhaps Librewolf.īut Librewolf aims to be a totally private web browser, and you do not even get to sign in to your Mozilla account in order to sync your bookmarks and web browsers. Perhaps the only downside of using Firefox browser is that it comes with a lot of features that many of us don’t even use (such as Pockets) and thus ends up adding a lot of bloat to the browser. Waterfox is a viable alternative for people who are looking for a Firefox alternative who do not want to use any Chromium-based web browser such as Brave or Chrome. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |